ENGLISH 110-04  Fall 2001 T/Th 2:00-3:50 p.m.

Natasha Saje, Ph.D.

Foster Hall 405   Office Hours  Mondays, 3-5:30 p.m.; Tuesdays 1:00-2:00 p.m. and Thursdays  4:00-5:30p.m. Other times also—stop by to see if I’m here.

Telephone: Office: 832-2376 (voice mail)  Home: 474-3579

Email: nsaje@westminstercollege.edu

 

Theme: Seeing Writing

"The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe."  John Berger

 

Objectives:

This is a course in writing, which is usually connected to reading visual as well as verbal texts. Think of it as a studio course, in which you will be practicing the art of writing, with me looking over your shoulder at several times in the semester, assessing the work you gather together in a portfolio. When I assess your writing I will be looking at your progress from draft to draft, and from one paper to the next. Writing and rewriting drafts of the "same" essay--trying to make it clearer and more nuanced, and sometimes, discovering what you think only as you write--is a great part of your success in this course. This should take about four hours a week, in addition to the time you spend reading. I hope you will value the group processes that can make writing easier and more fun. 

 

You will be writing essays that highlight your relationship to the history and culture we read about in the assigned texts. These meetings between past and present, reading and writing, and self and other, represent the workplace (or laboratory) of what is often called a "liberal education."   Doing research to supplement the readings will prepare you to do other college assignments.

 

 

Texts:

McQuade, Seeing Writing (St. Martin’s, 2000)

The New St. Martin's Handbook, 1999

You will also need a dictionary.

Plus other materials, to be distributed in class. Please also anticipate $5 or so in photocopying costs.

 


Read the syllabus before each class to see what is expected of you. I may not reiterate assignments in class. You will also be responsible for keeping up with any changes I may make in response to the needs of our particular class--I will announce these changes in class. If you have a documented disability, please see me (and the Start Center) right away to discuss accommodations. Evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty will result in failing grades or other forms of disciplinary action.

 

Attendance:

A class is a community and its success depends on everyone’s participation; thus, on-time class and conference attendance and participation are required. If you are absent or tardy more than three times, you will not be able to get an A, and if you miss more than eight classes, you will automatically fail.  If you are absent, you are responsible for finding out what you missed from a classmate.  If you are ill, as a courtesy let me know before class that you will be absent.

 

Assignments:

Written work for the course includes reading quizzes, exercises, in-class paragraphs, five short papers (3 pages, double spaced), and one longer paper (6-10 pages, also double spaced) which must be an expansion of one of the short papers, including library research. These should be typed using MLA guidelines (Chapter 42 Handbook). Assignments are due at the beginning of the class period. They may contain visual elements, but since this is a course in writing, the emphasis will be on writing. If you are ill and cannot complete an assignment, you must speak with me before it is due to arrange for an extension.  For other matters, you may also call me at home, but please first ask your question of someone else in the class. I will distribute a class roster with phone numbers.  Your grade for attendance and participation includes your attending one or more of the three poetry readings or a book festival event on campus this semester and writing a one paragraph response to the experience.

 

Papers must be typed, double spaced and headed as follows:

 

Essay #1                                                                      Jane Doe

                                                                                    English 110-04                                                

                                                                                    Dr. Sajé

                                                                                    12 September 2001

 

                                                            Title

 

Papers MUST have titles that reveal substance; i.e. "Foucault's Panopticon at Westminster College."  Titles to your papers should not be underlined and should not be in all capitals. Capitalize the first word and all words except articles.  DO NOT USE A COVER SHEET.

 

Grades:

In the past, students have appreciated getting comments without a letter grade for the first few papers because it allows them to concentrate on learning without being focused on grades. At midterm, I will write a summary paragraph of your work and assign you a letter grade. You may of course come see me at any time for more feedback or a more precise sense of how you stand in the course. The portfolio method I use in grading means that revision counts.  You may revise any of your papers at any time; please hand in both versions and be sure to include all versions in your portfolio. However, the revision must be real and not merely cosmetic (correcting the punctuation, for example or correcting the other errors I circled). If the revised paper is not substantially different from the first version, it is not a real re-vision and will not change your grade.

 

Grades are calculated on the following criteria:

 

1. Attendance and participation (includes peer reviews and writing done in class, plus poetry reading or book festival attendance) 25%

2. Five shorter essays 10% each


3. Final research essay 15%

4. Reading and grammar quizzes 10%

 

How much you improve will also be taken into account when I determine your final grade. I use the "portfolio" method, which means you should keep all written work in a folder and submit it at midterm and on the last day of class. You should keep copies of all essays and for the final research paper, submit all notes and drafts with the paper. In lieu of a final exam, I'll keep these portfolios for a year. If you want comments on your final essay, enclose two copies and a stamped, self-addressed envelope.

 

Here are the guidelines I use for grading papers (Adapted from Adelstein and Pival, The Teaching Commitment). Note that a paper must earn its grade: it starts with a "0" and works its way up.

 

1. Organization (10 points)

A. Is the paper about the assigned subject?

B. Does it have a clear, logically developed plan unified around a central thesis?

C. Is the subject adequately limited?

D. Is the paper written from a consistent viewpoint?

E. Does the paper have an effective introduction, conclusion and transitions?

F. Are the paragraphs organized around a topic sentence?

 

2.  Support of Generalizations (10 points)

A. Are relevant examples, illustrations, facts, or other forms of evidence used?

B. Would an intelligent reader accept the evidence used?

C. Are abstract words defined or illustrated?

D. Is the support of generalizations as complete as the time allotted for the assignment will allow?

 

3.  Mechanics/Usage (10 points)

A. Is the paper free of spelling errors? Is it generally free of others?

1. punctuation

2. fragments/comma splices/run on sentences

3. subject-verb agreement

4. pronoun-antecedent agreement

5. errors of case (him for he, etc.)

6. dangling or misplaced modifiers                    

 

4.  Content (50 points)

A. Is the paper interesting? Do the ideas reveal some maturity of judgment, some insight and critical perception?

B. Has the writer analyzed the subject accurately and thoroughly?

C. Have the writer's conclusions been developed from an objective, logical, comprehensive examination of the subject?


D. Has the writer gone beyond the obvious?

 

5. Language (10 points)

A. Is it appropriate for the purpose, audience and subject?

B. Are words used accurately and defined where ambiguous?

C. Has the writer avoided clichés and unnecessary repetition?

D. Is the language concrete and clear?

 

6. Style (10 points)

A. Are unnecessary words eliminated?

B. Is the tone appropriate to the audience, subject and purpose?

C. Does the writer appear to be sincere, reasonable and unbiased?

D. Are sentences varied in length and type? Is passive voice used only where necessary? Is subordination used to signal intended relationships?

 

Standards for paper grades:

 

The A paper not only fulfills the assignment but does so in a fresh and mature way. (It teaches me something!) Every paragraph has a clear purpose. Evidence is detailed, and the organization gives the reader a sense of the necessary flow of the argument. Prose is clear, apt and occasionally memorable. It contains few errors.

 

The B paper fulfills the assignment and may show some interesting thinking but has lapses in one of the crucial elements of good writing; it may be detailed and well-organized in one section, but not so in another. Or perhaps the argument is clear, but the prose is lackluster or contains several kinds of errors.

 

Note: Papers that earn C, D, and F grades tend to have underdeveloped paragraphs.

 

The C paper follows the assignment but does so either conventionally or superficially. (I've heard it before.) Adequate evidence is provided, but the reasoning is predictable and/or occasionally flawed. Sentence structure is generally correct, but not very interesting: the writer fails to use subordination, sentence variety, and modifiers to achieve emphasis.

 

The D paper either doesn’t follow the assignment or does so in a flawed manner. Often D papers do not have well developed paragraphs or a clear thesis.

 

The F paper could be off the assignment, could fall seriously short of minimum length requirements, or could be plagiarized. The thesis is unclear. Evidence is scarce. Organization is haphazard or arbitrary. The paper may contain numerous errors of grammar, spelling, punctuation, diction or syntax that hinder communication.

 

Peer Workshop/Draft  Groups:

An important part of this course. Meeting draft deadlines is the single most important factor for success in this course. 

 

Conferences:

A few times during the session I'll see each of you in conference in my office with a paper and your portfolio. You may, of course, make an appointment to see me any other time, or simply come to office hours. If you can't read my handwritten comments on your papers, please let me read them to you!

 


Assignments are due on the day next to which they appear. When you are asked to read a selection from Seeing Writing, be sure to read it twice, and read the questions afterward also. The reading assignments are many pages long, but contain lots of pages of images. Our discussion of the reading and images will span several days, until the paper generated from that unit is due. So please bring to class the book(s) and all material you need to write. Doing the reading should entail consulting a dictionary for words you don't know.

 

 

                                                                    SYLLABUS

Thursday 30 August

Introductions. Syllabus/course policies.

Write in class: definition of education

topic: constructing a paragraph

lesson on ethos, logos, pathos with print ads

 

Tuesday 4 September

Read Introduction xxix-lvi Seeing Writing

Read “Ways of Seeing” in Seeing Writing (512-525) and “Show and Tell” in Seeing Writing (526-550)

Read Handbook, 1-35.

 

Thursday 6 September

Read Chapter 1, Seeing Writing “Observing the Ordinary” p.2-62

Especially Baker, “Shoelaces”  (31) and Dillard,  “Seeing”  (38)

Read Handbook, 102-134 (constructing paragraphs)

Read Handbook, pp.32-49 (exploring, planning, drafting)

 

Naomi Shihab Nye reads in Gore Auditorium, 7 p.m.

 

Tuesday 11 September

Choose one writing assignment, p. 17 (#1 or #2) or p. 37 (#2). Draw upon Berger and McCloud to construct your argument.

 

Thursday 13 September

Draft Workshop: Bring 4 copies. Be sure to bring the advertisement you are analyzing.

Second half of class: grammar review—bring handbook.

 


Tuesday 18  September

Paper #1 due.

Read Handbook, 102-134 (bring to class, along with Seeing Writing).

 

Thursday 20 September

Read  Chapter 7, Seeing Writing, “Reading Icons” pp. 399-449 esp. Brubach (p.412-415); Rand (p.419-420); Betsky (p. 427-430); Brennan (p.438-440); Rehnquist (p.442-443).

 

Poet Peter Davison reads in Jewett Auditorium, 7 p.m.

 

 

Saturday September 22 and Sunday September 23

Great Salt Lake Book Festival at Westminster each day; I’ll distribute a schedule.

 

Tuesday 25 September

Continue discussion of “icon” chapter.

Choose one writing assignment: p. 401 # 1 or #2;  p. 416 #1 or #2; p. 421 #1

Thursday 27 September  

Draft Workshop: Bring  4 copies.

 

Tuesday 2 October

Paper # 2  “Coming to Terms with Place” due.

Read Handbook, 70-101 (Bring to class).

 

Thursday 4 October

Read “Figuring the Body” pp. 196-253 in Seeing Writing.

Especially Bordo, p 236

 

Tuesday 9 October

Choose one of the following writing assignments:

p. 201 #2

p. 205 #2

P. 225 #1 or #2

p. 221 #2

P. 231 #2

p. 235 #2

p. 243 #1 or #2

p. 255 # 2

 

Thursday 11 October

Draft Workshop: bring 4 copies.

Poet Chana Bloch reads in Nunemaker Place, 7 p.m.

 

 

Tuesday 16 October

Paper # 3 “Figuring the Body” due.

Read Handbook pp.249-268

 

Thursday 18 October

 

 

Tuesday 24 October

Read  “Engendering Difference” pp.258-320

Choose one writing assignment:

p. 263 #1 or #2

p. 277 #1 or #2

p. 279 #1 or #2

p. 295 #1 or #2

p. 299 #1 or #2

p. 309 #1 or #2

p. 323 # 1

 

 

 

Thursday 26 October

Continue discussion of readings.

 

 

 

Tuesday 31 October

Draft workshop: Bring copies: Paper #4: “Engendering Difference”

 

Thursday 2 November

NO CLASS: CONFERENCES THIS WEEK. BRING YOUR PAPER.

Paper #4 due in conference

Read Handbook pp.269-284.

 

Tuesday 6 November

Read  “Constructing Race” pp. 326-393

 

 

 

Thursday 8 November

Choose one writing assignment:

p. 331 #2

p. 337 #2

p. 378 #1 or #2

p. 380 #1

p. 395 # 1 or #2

 

Tuesday 13 November

Read Handbook pp. 435-443

Library Session: meet in Library Classroom

Paper # 5 “Constructing Race” due.

 

Thursday 15 November

Read Handbook pp. 444-515

Assign final paper: 6-10 page essay, an expansion of one of your previous papers for the course. You must use a minimum of five sources, including at least one “scholarly” source. You may use visual texts in addition to the 5-10 pages (double spaced) of writing.  Use MLA (parenthetical) citation form, explained in the Handbook, pp.516-563.

 

Brainstorm final paper ideas: bring your portfolios and Seeing Writing.

 

Tuesday 20 November

Read Seeing Writing “Reading Icons” pp. 399-449

Bring Handbook.

 

Thursday 22 November

Thanksgiving Holiday

 

Tuesday  27 November

Library Session: meet in Library Classroom

Bring rough draft/outline of your final paper (one copy).

 

Thursday 29 November

Read Seeing Writing “The Ethics of Representation” pp.499-509

Poet Charles Simic reads in the Jewett Center Auditorium, 7 p.m.

 

Tuesday 4 December

Draft Workshop: bring 4 copies of final paper

 

Thursday 6 December

last day of class: bring one copy of final paper (hopefully revised since Tuesday) and handbook

 

Friday 14 December

Exam, 2:00-3:50 p.m.

Portfolios due: you will write an overview of your work this semester