Natasha Sajé, Ph.D.

Foster Hall   405 Office Phone: (801) 832-2376

Home phone: 474-3579         email: nsaje@westminstercollege.edu

Office Hours: Mondays 1:00-5:00,  T/Th 4:00-5:30 p.m. other times by appointment.

 

E220-07: INTRODUCTION TO LITERATURE (Fall 2003)

M/W 7:30 p.m.-- 9:20 p.m.

 

Objectives:

This course gives you the tools for close-reading literature (and film) and applying various critical strategies to their understanding and explication.  I will also help you learn how to conduct basic library research in literature and how to write a paper for an English class. Most important, we shall seek to appreciate literature for the space it provides: space for imagining other ways of being and thinking.

 

Required texts:

 

handouts of poems by visiting poets

Scott Carpenter, Reading Lessons: An Introduction to Theory

Sandra Cisneros, Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories

Michael Downing, Breakfast with Scot

Barbara Hamby, The Alphabet of Desire

Emily Mann & Federico Lorca, The House of Bernarda Alba

Toni Morrison, Tar Baby

William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night

(All of these books are available in the library.)

 

Please also anticipate spending about $5 in photocopying costs.

Requirements:

If you have a documented disability, please see me (and the Start Center) right away to discuss accommodations.

 

1) Regular class attendance, careful reading, participation in class discussions and discussion questions, attending two poetry readings or book festival events, and some in-class or informal writing assignments.  Some weeks the reading load is heavier than others—plan ahead. Missing more than two classes precludes an A; missing more than six means failing the class. As a courtesy, please call me if you are ill; you are responsible for finding out what you missed from a classmate, and for keeping up with any changes in the syllabus. I will distribute a class list of phone numbers.  For each day of class, bring one discussion question on a piece of paper with your name on it. These represent a large part of this segment of your grade; they are in lieu of reading quizzes, so they should be thoughtful and let me know you read the assignment carefully. If you are distributing a one-pager that day, simply type your discussion question at the bottom. 25% of grade.

 


3) Ten weekly one-page, single-spaced, carefully focused and written and typed response/application/analysis papers.  Make copies for the entire class. 60% of your grade. See sample (attached). You may skip four weeks out of the fourteen. Keep in mind that you should not merely repeat what we’ve said in our discussions, and that it may be easier to distribute a paper on the first day that we discuss the book because that way you have an “open field.” One fun way to do these is in the form of letters, addressed to a particular person in the book, the author, or to a student in the class, or me. You can also take on different personae in your letter, writing as if you were one of the characters or an author. For instance, you might want to be Toni Morrison responding to William Downing or William Shakespeare responding to Federico Lorca. Another way to do these is to compare one (small) aspect of the book to its treatment in film or stage. You can also try applying the theoretical insights from the Carpenter book to the other books; for instance, do a structuralist analysis of  one of the novels or poems. Or apply one of the handouts on genre and theory to one of the texts, for instance using J. Hillis Miller's definition of narrative as a template to explain Tar Baby. Anything is possible as long as it pays close attention to the text(s) and shows you thinking.

 

4) One  (one page, single-spaced) abstract of a scholarly article. 7.5% of grade (due anytime we are discussing the book).

 

5) Take home midterm exam (details follow) and final in class overview: 7.5% of grade

 

COLLECT ALL PAPERS AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS TO BE HANDED IN AT THE END OF THE CLASS AS A PORTFOLIO

 

Grades are based on your work as described above, but how much you improve will also be taken into account when I determine your final grade. I will grade the one-pagers check, check plus, check minus, but will give you a midterm grade and write a paragraph about your work at midterm. Here are the guidelines I use for grading papers (Adapted from Adelstein and Pival, The Teaching Commitment). Note that a paper must earn its grade: it starts with a "0" and works its way up.

 

1. Organization (10 points)

A. Is the paper about the assigned subject?

B. Does it have a clear, logically developed plan unified around a central thesis?

C. Is the subject adequately limited?

D. Is the paper written from a consistent viewpoint?

E. Does the paper have an effective introduction, conclusion and transitions?

F. Are the paragraphs organized around a topic sentence?

 

2.  Support of Generalizations (10 points)

A. Are relevant examples, illustrations, facts, or other forms of evidence used?

B. Would an intelligent reader accept the evidence used?

C. Are abstract words defined or illustrated?

D. Is the support of generalizations as complete as the time allotted for the assignment will allow?

 

3.  Mechanics/Usage (10 points)

A. Is the paper free of spelling errors? Is it generally free of others?

1. punctuation

2. fragments/comma splices/run on sentences

3. subject-verb agreement

4. pronoun-antecedent agreement

5. errors of case (him for he, etc.)

6. dangling or misplaced modifiers                    

 

4.  Content (50 points)

A. Is the paper interesting? Do the ideas reveal some maturity of judgment, some insight and critical perception?

B. Has the writer analyzed the subject accurately and thoroughly?

C. Have the writer's conclusions been developed from an objective, logical, comprehensive examination of the subject?


D. Has the writer gone beyond the obvious?

 

5. Language (10 points)

A. Is it appropriate for the purpose, audience and subject?

B. Are words used accurately and defined where ambiguous?

C. Has the writer avoided cliches and unnecessary repetition?

D. Is the language concrete and clear?

 

6. Style (10 points)

A. Are unnecessary words eliminated?

B. Is the tone appropriate to the audience, subject and purpose?

C. Does the writer appear to be sincere, reasonable and unbiased?

D. Are sentences varied in length and type? Is passive voice used only where necessary? Is subordination used to signal intended relationships?

 

Standards for paper grades:

The A paper not only fulfills the assignment but does so in a fresh and mature way. (It teaches me something!) Every paragraph has a clear purpose. Evidence is detailed, and the organization gives the reader a sense of the necessary flow of the argument. Prose is clear, apt and occasionally memorable. It contains few errors.

 

The B paper fulfills the assignment and may show some interesting thinking but has lapses in one of the crucial elements of good writing; it may be detailed and well-organized in one section, but not so in another. Or perhaps the argument is clear, but the prose is lackluster or contains several kinds of errors.

 

Note: Papers that earn C, D, and F grades tend to have underdeveloped paragraphs.

 

The C paper follows the assignment but does so either conventionally or superficially. (I've heard it before.) Adequate evidence is provided, but the reasoning is predictable and/or occasionally flawed. Sentence structure is generally correct, but not very interesting: the writer fails to use subordination, sentence variety, and modifiers to achieve emphasis.

 

The D paper either doesn’t follow the assignment or does so in a flawed manner. Often D papers do not have well developed paragraphs or a clear thesis.

 

The F paper could be off the assignment, could fall seriously short of minimum length requirements, or could be plagiarized. The thesis is unclear. Evidence is scarce. Organization is haphazard or arbitrary. The paper may contain numerous errors of grammar, spelling, punctuation, diction or syntax that hinder communication.

 

Assignments are due on the date next to which they appear. We'll fill in the presentation due dates early in the semester.

 

Wednesday August 27

View the film Casablanca (which is discussed in this week's reading).

 

Wednesday September 3

topics: structuralism and close reading techniques

Read Carpenter, pp-1-35.

Read Cisneros, Woman Hollering Creek

 

Monday September 8

handout on narrative

Woman Hollering Creek

 

Wednesday September 10

handout of poems by Alexander Shurbanov

Woman Hollering Creek

Book Festival Weekend—schedule to be distributed.

Get your book signed by Cisneros if you like.

 

Thursday September 11

Alexander Shurbanov reads in Nunemaker Place, 7 p.m.

 

Monday September 15

Read Carpenter, pp 37-64.

topic: poststructuralism and deconstruction

Read Downing, Breakfast with Scot

 

Wednesday September 17

Downing, Breakfast with Scot

 

Monday September 22

Read Carpenter pp.89-114.

topic: gender studies

Downing, Breakfast with Scot

 

 

Wednesday September 24

Breakfast with Scot

 

Monday September 29

topic: postmodern fiction

Read handout of story by Grace Paley, “ A Conversation with my Father”

 

Wednesday October 1

topic: psychoanalysis

Read Carpenter pp.65-88.

 

Monday October 6

Reading poems: Read handout of poems by Mary Jo Bang

 

Wednesday October 8

Read handout of poems by Mary Jo Bang

 

Thursday October 9: Poetry reading by Mary Jo Bang in Nunemaker Place, 7 p.m.

 

Monday October 13

Midterm exam due in class: make copies for everyone.

On one single-spaced page, write four paragraphs about the theoretical frameworks we’ve been studying. You may use the books or poems as examples, but the focus should be on genre, theory, or criticism. (I'll attach an example.) When you write these, remember that we are interested in how you think, so don’t just copy a definition of modernism, for instance, onto the page, but rather, synthesize or question it. Make copies for the whole class (15 copies).

1) about something you understand completely

2) about something you more or less understand

3) about something you’re less sure of

4) about something that you don’t understand at all (it’s ok to make this last one a question)

 

 

Wednesday October 15

Read everyone’s midterm; come to class with questions.

in class: midterm evaluation

 

 

Read Carpenter  pp. 115-134 and 151-158

topic: new historicism and cultural studies

 

Monday October 20

Meet in Library Classroom for Session with Pavi Rentz on the MLA bibliography.

During this period you will find a scholarly article on Tar Baby, Twelfth Night, Woman Hollering Creek, or  House of Bernarda Alba  to abstract for the class.

Begin reading Tar Baby

 

 

Wednesday October 22

Tar Baby

 

Monday October 27

Tar Baby

 

Wednesday October 29

Tar Baby

 

Monday November 3

Tar Baby

 

 

Wednesday November 5

Read Barbara Hamby, The Alphabet of Desire

and handout of poems by David Kirby

 

Monday November 10

Finish Discussion of poems.

 

Wednesday November 12

Read House of Bernarda Alba

 

Westminster Players Performance

 

Monday November 17

Discuss House of Bernarda Alba

 

Wednesday November 19

Read Shakespeare, Twelfth Night

 

Monday November 24

Twelfth Night

 

Happy Thanksgiving!

 

Monday December 1

Twelfth Night

 

Wednesday December 3

Synthesis of critical approaches.

 

Monday December 8

Last day of class: synthesis of critical approaches.

 

Final Exam Period:  8:00 p.m. Wednesday December 10

Portfolios Due

In class: You will write an overview of your learning in the course.